doitmitch.com

Still needed Kobe to win - and he did some great stuff, including defense (a couple gambles aside) on Roy. Kobe facilitated very well early in the game, then single-handedly stopped the bleeding when the Blazers cut the lead to 8. What can you say? The Blazers had a lot of depth, size…but they don’t have Kobe, just an all-star in Roy, and that was the biggest difference tonight. I hoped we didn’t have to rely on him too much tonight, but his knee looked fine, and he still played like the best basketball player on the plant.

Ariza was quite excellent, including hitting an open three. No real surprises, but it’s great to have him back. His manly dunks and in-your-face blocks can generate a lot of momentum. Just an exciting player.

Radmanovic was quite a surprise. He hasn’t let up on his new determination to play defense. Great at snatching up entry passes - probably based on his lazy reputation before. But it was nice to see him care.

Gasol and Bynum - meh. Never really got involved. Nobody’s fault, really, we played more of an uptempo game. Still, there were some miscues, Gasol dropped a couple of passes, missed some easy shots…Bynum had some wild shots tonight, including some outside nonsense. I know he’s trying to develop that aspect of his game, but I felt he was going away from a sizable challenge in Joel and Oden tonight. He needs to be able to battle against big guys, and I don’t think Bynum did that tonight.

Odom was reasonably good, except for his usual questionable decisions, such as jacking up threes and passing to nobody. Still, he was a good presence out there, and he did some good defensive things - which is a great sign, considering he was mostly an average team defender at best.

Fisher was ultra-aggressive, which he had a right to be, considering how defenses play off him. Still, he’s not a great finisher, but oh well. His hustle makes up a lot for it, he was a bundle of energy tonight, big ups to old man Fish.

Farmar missed some shots, but was energetic, tried to attack the basket, was aggressive and active, 6 boards and 6 assists for the point guard.

On the Blazers’ side, Outlaw and Fernandez are serious business. Roy will always contribute even on an off-night, but these guys are heavy hitters. Veterans Blake and Pryzbilla were reliable as usual. Everybody else was disappointing.

Apparently, Oden is out with a mid-foot sprain, one more difference between the Blazers and the Lakers. They’re worse at nearly every position.

The Evidence:

A disturbing sight

In this video, Pau walks into the frame from 2:27 to 2:30. Now some may be surprised to what he looks like what his shirt off. I’m not talking about his looking like a creepy sexual deviant in the doorway - that’s obvious.

The medical community has diagnosed this condition as “skinny fat.”

Some of you may be shocked…”OMG look at that doughy mass of repulsive flesh.” But let’s be real, this is Pau Gasol. You know what his arms look like already. And they’re not impressive.

how can you play defense with those arms? oh wait, you can’t. good job, flab man.

No, I only would’ve been shocked had he taken his shirt off and was ripped just in the places where the jersey covered. Like he was wearing a jersey of muscle. I’d have to draw this to convey how funny this really is. Maybe I should just let this go. I won’t though, I’m going to draw this hilarious mental picture and upload it later. Oh, you guys are lucky. Lucky and blessed to be reading this.

It’s sad how guys like Bynum and Farmar could seemingly get buff over one summer, while Pau has been skinny fat his entire career. Two words buddy, perfect pushups.

Then again…if he gained muscle, he wouldn’t distract opponents with his prancing gait.
 

Which player in the NBA would you want taking a shot with the game on the line?
1. Kobe Bryant — 88.9%
(nba.com)

 Well, duh.

Well “deserve” is a tricky word. It’s a relative word. Nobody can unequivocally prove that Bynum deserves anything - if he gets paid now, it’ll be mostly based on potential - if not skill, then potential to stay healthy. Now how does one put a monetary value on potential?

Not all potential is created equal. For example, if you’re 6′6″ athlete that has basic fundamental basketball skills, you’ll probably have to fight your way to make it on a college team. If you’re 7-foot with fundamental skills, you’d be an NBA all-star.

True, centers are important. Not because they’re more talented than anybody else. Simply because it’s hard to find 7-foot quality athletes who can play the game. We’re talking about .001% of the population. That’s a small pool of candidates. Bynum is part of that small minority of human beings, and he’s a member of the even more exclusive club of being 7 feet and being able to run, jump, pivot, and generally do things that other 7-footers cannot do. Moreover, among the 7-foot athletes, Bynum has shown that he actually has some talent for this game and worked on his skills. In the world of the blind, the one-eyed man is king. In the world of the bumbling, inept giants, a 7-footer who can demonstrate some basic skills is master of his domain. That makes him a rare commodity, no matter his track record.

One can’t compare Bynum to the average basketball player, guards and forwards. There’s plenty of great athletes who had to fight, claw and tooth, their way to success. There’s less separation in talent and skill. Kobe Bryant is the greatest basketball player on the planet, but the difference between him and a second-tier shooting guard like Joe Johnson is not the same difference between Tim Duncan and Andres Biedrins. So, yes, the game, both basketball and financial, is different for big men, such as the Lakers’ signing of Kwame Brown based on almost purely potential, and guys like Jerome James, who only had to play his heart out for a few games to earn a ridiculous contract.

So, does Bynum deserve the max? Relative to the entire league, the way things generally work, no. Considering the special considerations, most importantly his being a center, the money game is a little different. In a hypothetical scenario, if Greg Oden, who has yet to play an official game, were eligible for free agency this past summer, how many teams do you think would have cleared some cap space to offer him a contract, despite his being 20 years old, coming off an season-ending injury, and having no NBA experience? He doesn’t deserve much, but I’m guess several teams would have positioned themselves to offer big contracts.

Likewise, Bynum doesn’t deserve the max, but there’s no question some teams would offer him just that and make him their franchise player and prayer. Luckily, the Lakers can wait this season out before offering Bynum anything, and Bynum can take this year to make a compelling case that he “deserves” the max. 

See you later, Underachiever
 

There’s no rule that the Lakers HAVE to keep or replace Odom. There’s several reasons why they probably won’t:

1. After Bynum gets his 10m+ extension, the Lakers will be at the luxury tax threshold even WITHOUT Odom’s contract. Think about that.
2. Odom plays the Lakers’ deepest position. Ariza, Walton, and Radmanovic all play small forward. 
3. Include Kobe there at SF, especially since Sasha was extended and probably will see his role grow (perhaps even eventually start). The need for a shooter on the floor explained Phil’s heavy usage of both Radman and Sasha in the playoffs, even with their drawbacks, even at the cost of benching Odom at crucial moments of the Finals.
4. Odom will be at best a 4th option on offense. What will his numbers look like? Can’t be better than 12 pts and 7 rebounds. Will the Lakers pay big money for that?
5. The arrival of Gasol essentially replaces Odom in a basketball sense, Bynum’s imminent contract extension essentially replaces Odom in a financial sense. The only thing left is the ax.
6. Odom will get substantial offers next summer. He’s been too successful at power forward, he’s been too solid, consistent, he overcame his past, he’s become a solid character guy, unselfish, versatile, and many teams can use him better an pay him better.
7. The Lakers will lowball Odom;  No doubt they’ll offer him something. But it won’t be enough. 

Do it, Mitch

Baron Davis opted out of the final year of his contract, making him a free agent.

In order to beat the Celtics, the Lakers need to work a deal with the Golden State Warriors, who can sign -and-trade Baron Davis for Lamar Odom and Jordan Farmar.

Few teams can offer as much money as the Warriors can, but the Warriors are reportedly not interested in giving Baron a big extension - thus Davis’ choice to opt out.

But losing Baron Davis for nothing would be a terrible scenario for the Warriors, since Monta Ellis isn’t a point guard who can run a team. In Jordan Farmar, the Warriors get one of the best young point guards in the league and a playmaking, uptempo forward in Lamar Odom, who fits in perfectly with Don Nelson’s offense. And since Odom is expiring, the Warriors can essentially give him a test drive - and have the option to let him expire, or use his expiring contract as a trade asset.

For the Lakers, Kobe Bryant’s prime years aren’t wasted by gambling on Farmar’s development and Odom’s adjustment to his new role. Fisher has shown to be limited as a full-time starter, and Baron Davis would prevent Boston’s zone and overload defenses on Kobe in the Finals. Baron Davis can break defenses down, penetrate, make plays, drop bombs from three, and wreak havoc on defense. Davis’s ballhandling and playmaking abilities would also allow Kobe to move to the wing where he’s traditionally been much more efficient.

It would cost Buss a hefty luxury tax, but how many opportunities does a team get to acquire an elite point guard who only 29 years old? Buss needs to stop gambling on Odom and Farmar, at the cost of squandering Kobe’s prime. Putting his money on great talent and experience is a sure thing.

And what’s Buss doing, paying 80m a year just to fall short? Go all the way.

Currently, the Lakers have over $75 million tied up in guaranteed contracts, one of the highest payrolls in the league. Their offseason moves are handicapped in two ways, the salary cap and the luxury tax. The exact amounts are yet to be determined, but based on the same rate of growth as the past few years, probably by $2-3 million.

1. Salary Cap.
The Lakers are way over the salary cap - last year it was just under $56 million. This year, probably $58m. The salary cap is set by the league to prevent big market, high payroll teams from acquiring additional stars. For example, Gilbert Arenas opted out of his contract, and is an unrestricted free agent, meaning he could sign with any team. He’s looking for a max contract starting at $14 million a year. So can the Lakers sign the hometown star? No, since the Lakers are over the salary cap.

That doesn’t mean the Lakers can’t sign any other players at all. The league provides for a few exceptions:

• Mid-level Exception: $5.6m (can be exercised every year)
• Biannual Exception: $2.3m (once every two years)
• Minimum: 440K to  $1.3m, depending on years of experience (no limit)

2. Luxury Tax
The Luxury tax is a dollar for dollar tax imposed by the league, penalizing teams that cross the luxury threshold. Last year, it was set at just under $68m. Note that there is about $20m wiggle room for a team to exceed the salary cap (meant to prevent major acquisitions) before they hit the luxury tax (meant to penalize teams that are overspending).  Let’s say the Lakers end up spending $80m this coming season, and the luxury tax is set at $70m. The Lakers must pay $10m to the league as a penalty.

Let’s look at an example. James Posey, who played a big role in the Celtics championship, is an unrestricted free agent, meaning he can sign with any team. He is generally considered to be a Mid-level amount player, around $5-$6m. But let’s say Boston wants him back, L.A. wants to steal him, and a third team, say San Antonio wants him to replace aging Bruce Bowen. But Posey isn’t going to cost the same to the teams. Since Boston and L.A. are over the luxury tax, it’s going to cost them $10, $12m a year to sign Posey. That’s more than what Manu Ginobili, Chris Kaman, and other better players make.

On top of that, the luxury tax hurts the team even when it tries to sign its own players. For example, Sasha Vujacic and Ronny Turiaf are free agents. Whatever offer they get from other teams, the Lakers must pay double to keep them.  Thus, teams try their damnedest to get under the luxury tax.

While most teams are above the salary cap, the luxury cap is a chokehold, it severely cripples a team’s ability to improve itself.

The team must re-examine its roster. Odom for $15m? The team will probably let his contract expire next summer.  Radmanovic for $6m? Jerry Buss is probably kicking himself for not terminating Radmanovic’s contract a couple years ago, when the Space Cadet injured himself trying to snowboard in Park City.

The very next day, Shaq pulls a hit-and-run:

“I was freestyling. That’s all. It was all done in fun. Nothing serious whatsoever. That is what MC’s do. They freestyle when called upon. I’m totally cool with Kobe. No issue at all. And by the way, don’t forget, six albums, two platinum, two gold. Anybody who knows me knows I’m a funny freestyler. Check the NBA DVD when I was rapping about Vlade Divac during my first championship run. Please tell everybody don’t make something out of nothing.”

“Everyone that knows Shaq knows two things about me: One, that I’m a rapper, and two, that I’m a comedian. When I played with Kobe, me, him, Brian Shaw, J.R. Rider, we had freestyle sessions all the time. … all in fun and we said crazier stuff than that. If I hurt anyone’s feelings, I apologize.”

(espn.com)

The LA Times reported about Odom possibly shifting back to guard next season. Now, some people are thinking, wait a minute, if Bynum returns, doesn’t that push Odom to SF? Why would he play shooting guard - isn’t that Kobe’s position?

Positions in the triangle offense are different than those of conventional offenses.
—you may skip this paragraph is you know what I’m talking about—

The triangle offense really employs a 2-guard front (no true point guard in theory), consisting of a lead guard and a lag guard. The purpose of having a 2-guard front is to react better to what the defense is doing. The purpose of the guards is to set up a sideline triangle (thus it’s namesake), made up of a post player (forward), guard (on the perimeter), and the wing (on the perimeter but close to the corner baseline). The purpose of this is to create an overload offense, to create a high percentage shot based on what the defenses do. On the opposite side, unrelated to the triangle, is the offside guard and offside forward. These guys should be good shooters because it’ll prevent defenses from overplaying the sideline triangle (coming to help, double-team, etc.). But upon ball reversal, they can either go to a 2-man game, isolation for the offside post, or they can set up another triangle on the opposite side (using the wing cutting baseline).

—end triangle jargon—

Odom did play more guard than forward in his first year under Phil Jackson, the 05-06 season. That year, Kobe played more on the wing, when Kobe averaged 35 points a game. This was also the year when Kobe scored 62 points in 3 quarters against the Mavs, and 81 against the Raptors.

There’s no question Kobe is most productive and lethal when he plays more at the wing and high post.

But Odom had struggled to organize the offense effectively, he wasn’t as proficient in that facilitator role, and the Lakers’ offense became too dependent on Kobe to do everything (Odom would just pass him the ball at the top of the key almost every time). On top of that, Odom wasn’t proving himself to be a capable 2nd scorer, especially on the perimeter.

Thus, Phil Jackson couldn’t think of a better solution than put Kobe Bryant back at guard FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE TEAM, since Kobe knows the offense and has the ability to throw entry passes, read defenses, run the pick and roll, drive and kick, etc. The proof was in the pudding. In 05-06, Kobe dropped 50 points on the Suns twice in that season (once in the reg season, once in the playoffs), and the Lakers lost both games. The limitations of a one-man wrecking ball and the demands of a sputtering-team offense pushed Kobe out of the interior and onto the perimeter, to a more playmaking, facilitating role in the following seasons.

So Phil moved Kobe back to guard in 06-07. But that year was even worse, showing that his teammates simply weren’t good enough - regardless of whether Kobe played the scorer or playmaker. Lamar had struggled facilitating the offense in the previous year, but when he moved into the frontcourt, Odom also struggled to consistently score. The conclusion was that Odom simply wasn’t consistent enough to be a 2nd option in any context

Luckily, after Gasol’s arrival, Odom embraced his role as the offside forward - and as the 3rd option. But how would he fare back at guard and as the fourth option when Bynum returns?

Odom’s move back to guard will be a bit different than in 05-06. It won’t be as demanding, since Fish can handle some duties (rather than the bit player Smush was), as well as Gasol in the high post, as well as Bynum in the low post, and of course, Kobe.

This time around, Odom won’t have to be the Scottie-Pippen type of facilitator to Kobe’s Jordan. Because we’re not the Bulls, we’re not the championship Lakers, we’re something entirely different. We have quality at almost every position, everybody is a willing passer and a scoring threat. No longer are the Lakers relying on Kwame, Smush, and Luke. Having the right kind of talent at every position is conducive to fully realizing the potential of the triangle offense.

Also, this time around, Odom also doesn’t have to be the 2nd option. So his role changes. Rather than a primary ballhandler at guard, Odom will be more of a trigger man and ball-mover. Rather than pulling up for the jump shot, he’ll have to catch-and-shoot.

As a whole, the guard role that Odom will have to play would be less demanding, but at the same time, these simpler demands aren’t his natural strengths, so he’ll have to adjust.

And anyways, the offense relies on a certain level of interchangeability, and of course, Kobe’s the ultimate bail-out card, so Odom will have ample time and wiggle room to acclimate himself with a modified role at guard.

Then again, why go through the trouble and risk of putting Odom through the adjustment, when they could probably acquire a more conventional catch-and-shoot small forward who could play perhaps even better defense? All at a cheaper cost? The Battiers, the Poseys, the Bowens, the Raja Bells, they don’t make max-money. They make MLE money.

A proper analogy would be Matt Damon in the Ocean’s movies. Matt Damon is an excellent actor, a leading actor, a serious actor. Wtf is he doing as a bit comedy actor in the Ocean’s movies? Clearly it’s really a Pitt-Clooney vehicle, everybody else is just along for the ride. Which is fine, because most of the supporting cast are role players. But Matt Damon? First of all, he’s not very funny but he’s trying really hard to be, and second of all, it’s kind of a waste of his talent.

Then again, he’s from Boston, so…figures.